6uo內蒙農場

警疑似違國際人道條約 巴打開po:《食過過期催淚彈嘅手足注意!!》

以下為原文:

https://lihkg.com/thread/1394990/page/1

【 香港可能面對緊一場極大嘅人道災難 】

(求廣傳。求廣傳。求廣傳。)

過期催淚彈呢件事可能比大家想像得要遠遠更加恐怖。香港人吸緊嘅,可能係山埃毒氣

牛奶本身有益,但飲一盒過期牛奶,尚且會肚痾兩日。催淚彈本身已經係極具刺激性嘅化學品,仲要再過期,可以毒到點?

係無人知。

(題外話:催淚彈係國際戰爭禁用嘅化武,我唔明點解香港都可以日日放向civilian)

作為一個醫科生,又識唔少朋友行得比較前抗爭,係728後呢幾日,我經唔同渠道聽到唔少朋友講有各式各樣嘅疑似催淚彈後遺症:確診嘅化學性肺炎(chemical pneumonitis)、頭痛、不停咳、失聲、心口/肺部痛、反覆肚瀉(呢個好多人有)、大量紅疹、化學𤆥傷,等等⋯⋯個人感覺,情況係比612同928都多都嚴重。

而最大問題係:佢地冇辦法走出黎指證呢個政府、呢班黑警。而家連人道救援嘅護士、路過嘅人,都一律被律政司控以可判十年嘅暴動罪,令到冇人咁講自己曾經係728到過現場,遑論挺身指證。甚至經過醫管局、私院「篤灰」事件,好多人怕到連睇醫生都唔敢。如是者:以後可能會有幾百幾千人受呢啲化武毒害而冇人知,但匿埋係屋企或者某個病房默默受罪。

我唔知道我聽返黎呢啲症狀中,有幾多係真係因過期催淚彈而起。我試過搵文獻去研究,但當然搵唔到:向活生生嘅人類施放化學武器、仲要過期嘅,如斯泯滅人性嘅行徑,邊有人會可以做實驗研究。但呢個正正係係香港發生緊嘅事。

搵返世界新聞,只有委內瑞拉、印度喀什米爾等極少數地區施放過過期催淚彈。委內瑞拉化學家Mónica Krauter曾指催淚氣體過期後會化成山埃(cyanide)、碳酰氯(phosgene)等極危險氣體。而喀什米爾醫生聯會亦曾指出TG本身已經可以致盲、流產、哮喘病發、癲癇、甚至死亡,而過期TG危害更加係無法估計。

我係度有幾個呼籲:
一)去過現場嘅朋友,身體唔舒服唔好嘅,千祈要睇醫生。有需要請搵杏林覺醒 Médecins Inspirés (電話:46100186)。
二)有事嘅或者知道身邊人有相關情況,又信得過我嘅,請聯絡我,我同可靠嘅醫生統計緊相關情況,考慮下一步行動追究黑警。我保證身份絕對保密。
三)記者朋友們,如果可以嘅幫手諗下會唔會可以investigate into this matter。
四)記者又好,咩人都好,以後去到現場,多啲留意附近彈殻,睇下有幾多係過期或者冇標示過期時間。
五)醫生同醫護組織:多留意有冇類似病例。
六)去現場嘅,戴豬咀,戴豬咀。

我地同香港警察呢個極邪惡嘅組織搏鬥緊,可能係面對緊世界上少有嘅危險嘅人道災難。委內瑞拉、喀什米爾嘅消息唔多,但呢度係香港,我地有能力做得更好,保護自己同身邊人,唔比人道災難係香港發生。

 

【 香港可能面對緊一場極大嘅人道災難…

Cheuk Pang Wongさんの投稿 2019年8月1日木曜日

 

 

首先有多位巴絲同埋醫生都有提過過期催淚彈係好毒,會產生Cyanide Oxide, Phosgene, Nitrogen…… 如想直接睇報俾禁止化學武器組織既理據,skip中間,去落d睇

Reference link (in spanish): https://www.lapatilla.com/2017/04/10/bombas-lacrimogenas-que-usa-el-gobierno-estan-vencidas-y-emanan-cianuro-recomendaciones/

我近日為依樣野做多種搜查,現提出理據:
Treaty Law 國際條約

CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, STOCKPILING AND USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION (關於禁止發展、生產、儲存和使用化學武器及銷毀此種武器的公約)
By OPCW (禁止化學武器組織)
Article 1.5: Each State Party undertakes not to use riot control agents as a method of warfare. (拎催淚彈作戰爭用途係唔得。)
Article 2.9 (d): 「Purposes Not Prohibited Under this Convention」 means: Law enforcement including domestic riot control purposes. (而用係riot control 係可以既)
“Practice Relating to Rule 75. Riot Control Agents.” Customary IHL – Practice Relating to Rule 75. Riot Control Agents, ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_rul_rule75.
The rule includes “Article I(5) of the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention”
The 1925 Geneva Gas Protocol (1925年日內瓦協議) prohibits the use, in international armed conflict, of chemical and biological weapons and methods of warfare. It does not impose limitations on the acquisition or possession of such weapons.

首先,同大家講,Tear Gas 係唔可以用係國際戰爭,否則係違犯國際法!
下?咁你講咩違反國際法?我之後會講,但大家要知道原來Tear Gas 係國際上有共識,多條law都講戰爭係唔用得。可想而知,佢本身個傷害力唔少。

如果以International Human Right Law 國際人權法去講,雖然到而家為止係未有一條law好確實係管制RCA (即riot control agents)既法案,不過,有唔少既人權準則係應用到,可以管番riot control agents。

上環同元朗事件上班警察係用左過度武力,並且再次可能違犯以下既野:
the right to life, freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, the right to engage in ‘peaceful protest’, and the right to health, together with attendant obligations on the restraint of force
e度 conclusion:係可以上報俾國際組織, eg. UN, EU, etc.

重點黎啦
首先,過期催淚彈係極不尋常!!因為過期係要換既,唔可能過期過到咁@_@
而使用依d 過期野所出既有毒化學物係有Chemical Warfare Agent 係on list!!!
[b]而使用依d 過期野所出既有毒化學物係有Chemical Warfare Agent 係on list!!!
[b]而使用依d 過期野所出既有毒化學物係有Chemical Warfare Agent 係on list!!!

Phosgene 中文叫做光氣,係一戰時期被德國軍隊使用,人體吸入光氣會因為與肺中的蛋白質產生反應,導致肺充滿液體,可能因而造成肺氣腫。@_@@_@@_@

phosgene is still regarded as a viable chemical warfare agent because it is so easy to manufacture when compared to the production requirements of more technically advanced chemical weapons such as the first-generation nerve agent tabun. - from wiki

 

Cyanide Oxide 當然實際個隻chemical要睇返條formula先肯定度邊隻,但氰化物係化學武器一種,Hydrogen cyanide 係一戰時期已被拎黎做化學武器。

A hydrogen cyanide concentration of 2000 ppm (about 2380 mg/m3) will kill a human in about one minute.[55] The toxicity is caused by the cyanide ion, which halts cellular respiration by acting as a non-competitive inhibitor for an enzyme in mitochondria called cytochrome c oxidase. – From Wiki

大家都知個毒性去到咩地步O:-)

而係國際人權期刊上有位學者叫Dr. Anna Feigenbaum,都有講過Expired Tear Gas 係十分危險,原因如下:

Expired tear gas is dangerous for a number of reasons.
1. the mechanism that sets off the canister and grenade can become faulty. This can lead to injury for personnel using the device. It can also make incendiary devices increasingly likely to cause fires.

2.[b] the chemical compound contained in the grenade may no longer be approved according to the most recent safety tests and certificates. (因為Mónica Krauter 證實左e樣野,互相呼應)

3. it can be even more difficult to trace expired gas canisters to their point of sale. This is because less-lethal ammunitions do not have the same kind of tracking procedures as firearms, they can be moved between storage facilities with little or no publicly accessible documentation.

基於今次警犬使用過度武力同意圖毒害我地義士,將會發展多方攻勢重炮反擊,歡迎各文宣組加入戰線反擊。#kill2#

仆街警犬,想毒殺香港人!而家搞大佢!#fire#

Loading...

喜歡我們的文章嗎?按個讚吧!

關 閉 視 窗

(2435)